Mandeville council changes fill ordinance

By Chad Ruiz
St. Tammany News
Published on Wednesday, July 9, 2008 8:47 AM CDT



Mandeville residents will soon have different restrictions on the use of fill on their property thanks to some tiring work done by the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission.

It’s very confusing and detailed, Planning and Zoning Director Louisette Kidd explained.

The previous ordinance states up to 24 inches of fill can be used under the roof-shed of the house, meaning homes could not be raised with more than 2 feet of dirt. If a raise higher than 2 feet is required, a chain wall or pylons would have to be used. This, Kidd said, was meant to include other structures on the property as well, but the language of the ordinance was convoluted and lacking essential details.

“From a legal standpoint, it never addressed fill anywhere else on the lot,” Kidd said.

With the work of council members Zella Walker and Trilby Lenfant, an amended version of the ordinance was prepared and passed that addresses the use of fill across the property.

The new ordinance repeats the maximum 2-foot allowance under the roofline of the home, but the big change, Kidd said, concerns attached and detached structures, particularly garages.

With the old ordinance, structures like attached garages were raised to any height desired, but now they can’t be raised higher than 32 inches above the existing grade.

Detached structures also took a hit, and now only 1 foot of fill material is allowed under the roofline with the structure’s finished floor elevation not to exceed 18 inches above the existing grade.

“Before you could build pool houses and accessory buildings the same level as the house,” Kidd said.

According to the new ordinance, detached structures are not allowed that high, and this has some residents upset and concerned for the integrity of their structures during flood events.

Kidd said the big question people are asking is why not allow residents to build accessory structures out of harm’s way.

“We certainly want the house out of harm’s way, but we would like people to build environmentally friendly and not change the entire environment when building on lots,” Kidd said.

Protecting vehicles in garages comes secondary with pools and other accessory structures tertiary with means of protection, Kidd said.


Comments

No comments posted.

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: