Fireworks ban may fizzle after public opposition

By Matthew Penix
St. Tammany News
Published on Monday, August 4, 2008 9:17 AM CDT



A proposed ban on fireworks in unincorporated St. Tammany Parish may be a dud as area residents and at least five parish council members called the proposal un-American and near impossible to enforce.

During a public meeting Wednesday night to hash out logistics, the majority of residents who spoke opposed the ban, while others rallied to stomp out fireworks altogether. No vote was cast or ordinance introduced, but the meeting was held to gauge public opinion on the issue, which largely centered on tighter restrictions but no outright ban.

Parish Councilman Henry Billiot launched the ban topic in May after eight-and-a-half years of constituents’ complaints every New Year’s Eve and July 4. He also cited safety concerns, saying a 7-year-old Mandeville boy once “blew his face off” with fireworks.

“I need to hear from the people what they want,” he said Wednesday night. “But I think there is inherently something wrong with a 15-year-old going in with a pocket full of money and coming out with a bag full of fireworks.”

Under Louisiana law, anyone 15 years or older can buy fireworks in the days leading up to July 4 and New Years Eve. They must also be sober and “of good character,” a move that many council members laughed about. In all of St. Tammany’s municipalities, the use and sale fireworks is banned.

“At the very least we need to increase the legal age to 18 or 21,” Councilman Marty Dean said.

Dean, with council members Marty Gould, Rebecca Crawford Howell, Gene Bellisario, Richard Artigue, Kenneth Burkhalter and Al Hamauei said either they didn’t favor the prohibition or it’s too difficult to enforce.

“Just because we ban them doesn’t mean they won’t buy them in Mississippi and bring them back,” Artigue said.

Others likened the proposal to “Big Brother government” intruding in residents’ lives.

Gould, who called lighting fireworks a fundamental right, said, “A lot of injuries we hear about are because parents aren’t doing their jobs,” and he wondered if the ban would encroach on their rights to parent.

He opposes the ban but agrees tighter restrictions are needed, he said.

In addition to increasing the legal age, some community residents and council members argued for restricting the time frame to light fireworks to the days around July 4 and New Years Eve. Others even offered restricting lighting fireworks in densely populated areas.

One Slidell resident, Gail Ledet, suggested a community open space, policed by law enforcement, where people could fire fireworks.

“I pray for rain on New Year’s and the Fourth of July,” she said. “The general public just doesn’t have the expertise to put fireworks out there … It’s very dangerous.”

Ledet, who lives in Slidell, said kids constantly shoot bottle rockets at each other across canals. Bottle rockets are illegal in St. Tammany Parish but are often fired during the holidays, a move that seemed to back Artigue’s claim the fireworks will be trucked in from the outside.

Carl Hodge agreed.

As owner of Crazy Carl’s fireworks, a retailer for 32 years, largely in St. Tammany, he said he’d move his business from Slidell to just beyond the Mississippi line if a ban was adopted.

“I’ll be the first to put up a stand in Picayune,” he said. “It’s not going to stop people from buying them, and we would lose the tax revenue.”

In 1939 fireworks were banned in New Orleans, but “you don’t see it stopping people there” from lighting the booming bombs, he said.

“Everything we do has a little danger to it. We get up and go on the road, it’s dangerous,” he said, adding later, “Houses have probably burned down, but Christmas trees burn down homes all the time. Lets ban Christmas trees, too.”

Bill Tudwill, another firework retailer near Hodge, agreed.

He said he’s operated his stand near Eden Isles since the late 1980s and invested hundreds of thousands into the business.

“We would definitely not let you take our property without compensating us for it,” he said. “It’s unfair. It’s just not right.”


Comments

2 comment(s)

    U R Right wrote on Aug 5, 2008 10:40 AM:

    " I agree with the comment above. Fireworks are a nuisance and an irritation but they are also an American tradition on special holidays.If they are monitored and used correctly there is less chance of anyone being injured. The fireworks become a real irritation when people continue to shoot them 3 or 4 weeks later because they have a leftover supply. Common sense is the key in having good community relations. You have a problem when you abuse priviledges and irritate your neighbors with your actions. "

    R. Side wrote on Aug 4, 2008 12:00 PM:

    " A ban of fireworks in St Tammany would be wrong. I personnaly am not a fan of fireworks on our streets. It makes it hard to drive through some neighborhoods on certain holidays, they drive my dog crazy, but they are a tradition. Its part of our lives, if we ban fire works, then we should ban trick or treating, and white wendsday, or tailgating at parades. Lets not allow other states or parishes to dictate how we live our lives. Lets vote to keep St Tammany, St Tammany. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: