Slidell puts brakes on modular home sales

City Council votes 5-2 to place six-month moratorium on sale and construction

By Erik Sanzenbach
St. Tammany News
Published on Monday, August 18, 2008 10:06 AM CDT



With a 5-2 vote, the Slidell City Council passed an ordinance Tuesday night imposing a six-month moratorium on the sale and construction of modular homes within city limits.

Modular homes are brought onto a site by trailer in parts and then put together. There are five modular home dealers in Slidell, and they will be affected by the moratorium.

Council members who voted for the moratorium said it was necessary while the city drafts its master plan for development over the next 20 years.

These modular homes that are on display behind a shopping center on Gause Boulevard may soon be gone thanks to a modular home moratorium passed by the Slidell City Council. (Staff Photo by Erik Sanzenbach)

“We want to see how modular homes affect new zoning rules,” Council President Raymond Canada said. “Some modular homes are appropriate, some are not.”

Councilman-at-large Landon Cusimano said the current city code is “too gray” on the issue of modular homes.

“The moratoriums gives us a chance to make decisions on the issue,” Cusimano said.

However, council member Kim Harbison said there is no need for a moratorium. She claims the homes meet the requirements of the city’s building code.

“If they are legal and meet our codes, why is there a moratorium?” Harbison wondered.

She insists that despite the look of modular homes, they are not trailers, but real houses.

“People need to know the difference between trailers and modular homes,” Harbison said.

She also said the moratorium was “rotten timing” for one modular home company, New Gulf Coast Homes, that has several modular homes on display next to a shopping center in the 1500 block of Gause Boulevard. They had recently set up shop and have applied for a conditional use permit to operate. Now, Harbison said the new business might suffer because of the moratorium.

The owners at New Gulf Coast Homes would not comment on the moratorium when contacted Wednesday.

The ordinance passed 5-2 with Harbison and Councilman Bill Borchert voting against it. Councilman Warren Crockett was absent from the meeting.

In other business the council:

Approved the re-appointment of Mary Lou Hilts to a seven-year term on the Planning and Zoning Commission.

Voted by ballot to elect Andy Prude to the Northshore Harbor Center Board of Directors to fill the unexpired four-year term of Gwen Wade, who recently resigned. Prude and Martin Bruno were both nominated. Prude got five votes, and Bruno had two votes.

Voted to change Council Rules of Procedure so there must be a unanimous vote by the council to accept additions to the council agenda after it has been printed. This was done to be in accordance with state law.


Comments

14 comment(s)

    Evan wrote on Aug 27, 2008 3:39 PM:

    " I know Slidell is a quiet, nestled, peaceful city in Suburbia. I know this. That doesn't give ANYONE the right to say your house is better than anyone elses.

    Try to church it up however you like- blame housing codes or whatever else- but you know and I know the truth: the thought of mobile homes in your neighborhood scares you. You're scared your friends in "fancy" neighborhoods will think less of you. I get it. Just admit it to yourselves, dont try to find an excuse. Tell the truth. "

    christy wrote on Aug 27, 2008 8:22 AM:

    " Shame on our city council. I use to be proud to call Slidell home, but more and more the actions of my towns government make me ashamed to call this home. Shame on you. This can only be comming from a point of greed. wonder who's pockets benift from this? Everyone desirves affortable housing.
    YES IN SLIDELL. "

    tamstress wrote on Aug 26, 2008 9:37 AM:

    " Ask any inspector with the city or the parish, these modular homes DO NOT meet code. They are supposed to, the plans say they will, but the plumbing & electricity are not installed to code. If the manufacturers perform to the specs that they provide, and meet the Southern Plumbing Code, these would be safe, affordable housing. But that is not happening. Prospective homeowners pay for a house that meets certain standards & what is delivered to them is sub-standard & dangerous. Hooray for the city council for standing up for the homeowners being robbed. "

    Mary wrote on Aug 26, 2008 8:44 AM:

    " So, what will happen with the city offices? "

    Erin wrote on Aug 25, 2008 3:02 PM:

    " Gee Ms. Harbison, I thought your allegiance would be to the residents of Slidell that put you in office, not the latest fly by night business to role into town.
    You & Borchert deserve each other.
    Thank you to the council memebers who have the foresight to realize that this type of housing is not what our town needs. If you want to live in those things, move to Pearl River.
    Hopefully, the moratorium will last longer than six months. "

    Rick wrote on Aug 24, 2008 8:25 PM:

    " The stupidity of our so called public servants amazes me. The city and the parish both try their darndest to make it as hard and expensive as they possibly can for the average family to have a nice place to live. These modular homes are better built than most of the stick homes being built in our area and most look nicer too. As someone said, its all about money and how much they can pocket. Thank you Bill Borchert and Kim Harbison for your wise votes. These other so called servants need to get the boot!!! "

    Lewis wrote on Aug 23, 2008 6:50 AM:

    " By the way if I buy a piece of land inside the city limits or in the parish it belongs to me which makes it private not intended for public use. If I wanted to live on swamp land filled in with old car tires and trash then covered up by fill dirt and have to have poles drove 30 - 40 feet in the ground so my house wouldn't sink away then I would build in Eden Isle, Oak Harbor, Balair Estates, MoonRaker and the list goes on. Your PUDs (Public Urban Development) wish you luck. "

    Lewis wrote on Aug 23, 2008 6:33 AM:

    " People don't understand these homes are built inside of buildings where all the material is stored in dry places. They meet HUD (Federal) specs which exceeds our local guidlines. These houses are better than prefab ones which is brought to its location on trailers and unloaded on the ground to be rained on, moisture to soak up into the wood. Even stick built homes lumber is brought in by trucks and dumped on the ground and left uncovered until its used whether for building or firewood because it got damaged setting outside and warped beyoung its use. Save Money! "

    R.SIDE wrote on Aug 22, 2008 1:35 PM:

    " What are you trying to say AMCIT? Are you suggesting that low cost housing is the cause of our problems here in Slidell.
    All layers of society need affordable housing. Without affordable housing where will those who are less fortunate live? Are you suggesting that affordable housing increases crime?
    Come on, everybody needs a chance. "

    AM CIT wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:05 AM:

    " These are nice homes, and should be allowed to be purchased and placed on private property, but not in the city limits of Slidell.
    Our fine city has suffered enough after Katrina, the influx of the criminal element, crowded roads, overcrowded schools have resulted in a decline in quality of life in our great city. Now is not the time to encourage more low cost housing into our area. The city councel should put this to a vote by us the citizens, let the tax payers decide. "

    Evan wrote on Aug 20, 2008 10:52 AM:

    " Thank you Bill Borchert, While your colleagues voted for this because they don't want any more mobile homes in Slidell, you aren't that shallow. It seems your colleagues want Slidell to be one big Oak Harbor- that is unreasonable and this moratorium is just a dig at the low income and some of the blue collar population of Slidell. "

    Lewis wrote on Aug 19, 2008 6:09 PM:

    " The council is against these type homes because their isn't anything in it for them or their pockets. The city can't charge people for building permits if they aren't built here just the basic electrical and plumbing permits is all they make. I've been in some of these homes and in the process of may be buying one for myself. But I'll be moved to another area from all the crooked politics in this state. "

    Mike Zenga wrote on Aug 19, 2008 1:19 PM:

    " As a modular home builder myself, I find it ridiculous the city council would enact a ban at this time. Modular homes are affordable, reliable and environmentally responsible. Modular technology has come a long way in the last 20 years, people have to move beyond the idea that they're 'trailer' homes. Hopefully the council will have a change of heart in the near future. "

    Jerry Rouleau wrote on Aug 19, 2008 7:02 AM:

    " What a shame. Sounds like the council does not have a clue on the difference between modular and manufactured homes. I am amazed to see that an area that needs housing so badly, makes it so hard for those that need them. Guess the council members are snug and comfortable in their homes and don't care about those that are in need.

    Jerry Rouleau "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: