Covington City Council questions Trailhead usage

By Debbie Glover
St. Tammany News
Published on Friday, May 8, 2009 9:33 AM CDT



Covington Councilman at large Trey Blackall put forth a proposal at Tuesday night’s Council meeting that would question the policy of after-hours use and rental of the Covington Trailhead’s bathrooms and electricity.

The use of the facility and the policy of locking the bathrooms and turning off the electricity that powers the outdoor fans were questioned by Covington businesswoman and resident Kay Morse. Morse had attended the Tea Party gathering April 15 at the facility and was appalled that the fans were not in operation and the bathrooms locked.

Covington Mayor Candace Watkins explained that the city does not rent out the facility and it is closed at its normal hour of 4:30 p.m.

“Our policy is not to rent the Trailhead for a private party... we cannot expend public funds to have someone there for any kind of political meeting,” said Watkins. She later said that she did not want to encourage people to be at the site at night unsupervised.

Morse said the party was not private, but open to whomever would like to attend, no matter what political belief or party affiliation.

“I myself am a Democrat,” said Morse.

She also said that the event was not political, but she had attended to get information regarding how tax revenue is being spent in Washington, D.C. She said that the Trailhead was built with taxpayer money, and the taxpayers should be allowed to use it.

She closed by asking, “Why can’t the policy be changed to accommodate the people?”

Watkins said the city couldn’t afford to have someone there to lock up after normal business hours.

“We need to examine what the policy will be at the Trailhead because it was built with public funds,” Blackall said.

He added that he had no problem with the bathrooms remaining open for gatherings after hours. “We (the Council) need to sit down with Pam (economic development director, Pam Keller) and the people at City Hall,” he said.

He also said that the Tea Party brought 700 people to downtown Covington, many of whom went out after the event to eat at local restaurants, thus having an economic impact on city businesses.

“There must be a monetary figure we can reach to provide for it,” Blackall said. “Any group should be able to use that facility, even if it’s not an economic development office event.”

Watkins said that when the facility was built, it was originally designed as an outdoor facility and as things progressed, it was changed to include a building with exhibit and office space, the maintenance of which were not in the original budget. She also said that at the time of the event, the city simply was not prepared.

Other concerns raised by Morse at the meeting included the intermittent telephone problems at City Hall. A real estate broker, Morse said that many times she needs to contact City Hall for information or questions a client may have. Sometimes she is put on hold and the call is dropped, and at other times she cannot get through at all.

Watkins agreed that there have been problems with the system, but since the offices are now in permanent locations, she hope to have the problems finally fixed.

In other business, an ordinance setting inspection fees for residences at $25 and for commercial and institutional buildings at $60 per inspection was approved unanimously.

The city’s building official, who hires the independent certified inspectors to examine each site, sets the number and type of inspections necessary. The average number of inspections for a residential building is five.

Watkins said that inspections are done only for a legitimate reason and to set a minimum or maximum number of inspections in the ordinance itself would unduly remove the discretion needed by the city’s building official.


Comments

8 comment(s)

    C SPARKLE wrote on May 12, 2009 8:32 AM:

    " First of all let me commend the fine people of the St Tammany News for giving its readership this forum in which to express our concerns over issues reported in this fine paper.
    Our tax dollars paid for this trail head, and some of us do not have the opportunity to enjoy the facilities until after work, or school. Why should it be reserved for those with days off.

    Hats off to Dave for telling us what is important in our lives and what is not. "

    Joe wrote on May 11, 2009 10:34 PM:

    " Ah yes, just what we need, MORE fees to pay. Do these inspection fees go to the independent certified inspector? We have more fees & permit fees than most major cities & not even a street light on major roads to show for it. Just who gets all these fees & deposits etc. They certainly don't go to public services for the working man. "

    Dave wrote on May 11, 2009 1:28 PM:

    " This is not really a big deal, people. Move along. Get back to your simple lives of frittering away time with complaining and whining. When you have something dire and detremental to society to bring up, you'll have cause for honest outrage. Until then, keep your lives in perspective. "

    KenO wrote on May 10, 2009 9:01 PM:

    " R Side Great comments. the Trailhead is a great public place, the council needs to develop ways to use this space to energize downtown "after-hours". "

    boondoggle wrote on May 10, 2009 9:09 AM:

    " watkins absence from the tea party was conspicuous.

    she, like the rest of liberals, figured the tea parties as a republican only event. what is it about out of control government spending that she doesn't understand.

    Oh wait, she IS an out of control government spendaholic. "

    E wrote on May 10, 2009 8:36 AM:

    " Who goes to a public facility after 4:30 pm anyway?? I question the whole Trace thing anyway. People, our tax millage rate is roughly comparable to that of Orleans Parish and 60% higher than Jefferson yet little public water, sewerage, street lights, garbage pickup, etc. Additonal millage for this, additional millage for that. It adds up people. JUST SAY NO!! "

    Devils Advocate wrote on May 8, 2009 8:37 PM:

    " It should have the same policy as the City Parks do. CLose at dark and have police security after hours. Its simple.

    I agree with R. Side "

    R. SIDE wrote on May 8, 2009 12:38 PM:

    " What is up with the city council in Covington. This situation smells of political favoritism, and power greedy elected officials. 430PM, who are they kidding?

    The trail head should close at sunset, unless special arrangements are made, and there should be an opportunity for tax payers to make special arrangements. I vote for a recall! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: