The dissenting vote was cast by Sacco because of inconsistent language in two portions of the text that was not addressed until the night of the vote. He said he felt it should have been addressed earlier than an amendment to the text prior to a final vote.
The final step in the comprehensive plan will be to develop the zoning maps that will define, at a glance, the types of land use allowable in the city, including various residential, commercial, institutional and other categories.
|
|
The new comprehensive plan will cut down on the number of “spot zoning” cases and the new provisions will better define the intent of the city’s zoning to limit the number of cases that will be granted variances by the Board of Adjustment for hardships.
In discussions throughout the past few years, the city was divided into zones by planning consultant Steve Villavaso and Associates.
Topics covered in the text include mixed use overlay plans and districts, the historic district, signage, planned use development overlay districts, flood prevention requirements, parking requirements, landscaping, outdoor lighting regulations, nonconforming uses, home occupations, several specific businesses such as truck stops and tattoo parlors and other businesses.
The sign ordinance originally proposed by the city council was incorporated into the comprehensive zoning ordinance and is addressed in detail, including matters such as obsolete signs and enforcement of the sign code.
The comprehensive zoning initiative began three years ago to help prevent spot zoning and plan for the city’s future.
In addition, the new ordinance will allow many smaller changes, detailed in the text, to be handled administratively by the office instead of going before the planning and zoning commission and/or the board of adjustments.
The proposed text clarifies many issues that have caused concern, including traffic studies and density problems that have added to infrastructure problems in the past.
The new ordinance details what is and is not required by each classification and the processes that are needed to adhere to the new ordinance.
Any changes imposed by the city council in adopting and/or implementing the plan will not affect anyone immediately. If a business is in a current zone that allows for mixed use and is rezoned residential, the business is grandfathered in and will be allowed to operate as usual, said Vilavaso and city Planning and Zoning Director Naketah Bagby earlier in the process.
Current land use will not be affected by the maps or ordinance since it would be grandfathered in and will continue to be allowed. However, if a use is discontinued, property will fall under the new ordinance.
“Zoning and land use follows the land, not the owners,” said Vilavaso in 2008. “Many of the changes will reflect a more appropriate renaming of what you already are in many neighborhoods.”
Currently, 60 percent of the city is residential.The zoning ordinances and map have not been updated since 1968 and the new ordinance will provide a clear, concise rendering, negating the old ordinance that was in some areas, in conflict with one another.
Meeting dates to considered and comment on the zoning maps have not yet been scheduled, but will begin soon.
To view the completed zoning text, visit the website at www.cityofcovingtonla.com.


View Jobs
View Homes
View Autos

Comments
NOFLOOD wrote on Mar 21, 2010 11:31 AM:
The NFIP has paid out only $11.6 billion dollars in claims since 1978.
The NFIP owes the US Treasury 20 billion dollar.
FEMA pay’s the insurance industry $ .71 cents of every dollar in premiums it collects.
The NFIP puts the burden on the tax payers to correct bad data used for this new insurance maps.
Let’s stop this waste.
Let’s help balance the budget.
Let’s cut this wasteful federal program.
Tell your Congressman and Senators not to fund the NFIP. "
NOFLOOD wrote on Mar 21, 2010 11:26 AM:
US Code from Cornell University
§ 4104. Flood elevation determinations
(f) Reimbursement of certain expenses; appropriation authorization
When, incident to any appeal under subsection (b) or (c) of this section, the owner or lessee of real property or the community, as the case may be, incurs expense in connection with the services of surveyors, engineers, or similar services, but not including legal services, in the effecting of an appeal which is successful in whole or part, the "